News Centre
News Type
Send your inquiry
POM vs PA66: Mechanical Properties, Cost & Application Comparison
Side-by-Side Property Comparison
Property | POM (Polyacetal) | PA66 (Nylon 66) | Winner |
Tensile strength (MPa) | 70 | 80 | PA66 |
Flexural modulus (GPa) | 2.6 | 2.8 | PA66 (dry) |
Impact strength (kJ/m²) | 8 | 12 | PA66 |
Service temperature (°C) | 100 | 120 | PA66 |
Water absorption 24h (%) | 0.22 | 1.5 | POM |
Water absorption (saturation %) | 0.8 | 8.0 | POM |
Dimensional stability | Excellent | Poor (wet) | POM |
Wear resistance | Excellent | Good | POM |
Chemical resistance | Good | Fair | POM |
Fatigue resistance | Excellent | Fair | POM |
Cost (USD/kg) | 4–8 | 3–6 | PA66 |
Machinability | Excellent | Good | POM |
Food contact (FDA) | ✓ (natural) | ✗ | POM |
Where POM Excels
Dimensional Stability in Humid Environments
POM‘s most significant advantage over PA66 is its dramatically lower moisture absorption. At saturation, PA66 absorbs up to 8% water by weight, causing:
· Dimensional swelling of 2–3%
· Reduction in tensile strength of 30–50%
· Decrease in flexural modulus of 50–70%
POM absorbs only 0.8% at saturation, maintaining dimensional tolerances and mechanical properties even in high-humidity or submerged applications.
Fatigue Resistance
POM‘s high crystallinity (75–85%) gives it outstanding fatigue resistance — the ability to withstand millions of loading cycles without failure. This makes POM the preferred material for:
· Gear wheels and racks
· Clip fasteners and snap-fit mechanisms
· Spring components and latches
· Conveyor belt links
Food Contact Compliance
Natural POM (both homopolymer and copolymer) is FDA compliant under 21 CFR §177.2470/2480. PA66 is not FDA approved for food contact due to amine migration concerns. This makes POM the automatic choice for food processing equipment.
Chemical Resistance
POM resists organic solvents, fuels, oils, and weak acids/bases better than PA66. PA66 is attacked by strong acids, bases, and some polar solvents that POM tolerates.
Where PA66 Excels
Higher Impact Strength
PA66‘s superior impact toughness (50% higher than POM) makes it the preferred choice for components subject to sudden impact loads — bumper brackets, tool housings, and protective covers.
Higher Temperature Resistance
PA66‘s continuous service temperature of 120°C (vs POM‘s 100°C) and higher HDT gives it an edge in under-hood automotive and industrial heating applications.
Cost Advantage
PA66 is typically 20–40% cheaper than POM, making it attractive for high-volume applications where POM‘s advantages (dimensional stability, wear resistance) are not critical.
Reinforcement Response
PA66 responds better to glass fibre reinforcement. PA66 GF30 achieves tensile strengths of 180 MPa, while POM GF30 reaches only 140 MPa. This makes glass-filled PA66 the preferred structural plastic for automotive and industrial components.
Application Selection Guide
Application | Recommended | Reason |
Precision gears | POM | Dimensional stability, fatigue resistance |
Food processing equipment | POM | FDA compliance, moisture resistance |
Snap-fit clips/latches | POM | Fatigue resistance, spring-back |
Chemical pump impellers | POM | Chemical resistance |
Impact-resistant housings | PA66 | Higher impact strength |
High-volume automotive parts | PA66 | Lower cost |
Structural components (reinforced) | PA66 GF30 | Better reinforcement response |
High-temperature automotive | PA66 | 120°C service temp |
For more material comparisons, see our PEEK vs PTFE guide and Engineering Plastics Overview.
FAQ
Q1: Is POM or PA66 better for gears?
POM is the preferred material for precision gears due to its superior fatigue resistance, dimensional stability (low moisture absorption), and excellent wear properties. PA66 gears may swell and change dimensions in humid environments, affecting mesh precision.
Q2: Which absorbs more moisture: POM or PA66?
PA66 absorbs significantly more moisture than POM. At saturation, PA66 absorbs up to 8% water by weight, while POM absorbs only 0.8%. This makes POM the clear choice for applications requiring dimensional stability in humid or wet environments.
Q3: Is POM or PA66 more cost-effective?
PA66 is typically 20–40% cheaper than POM. However, when factoring in POM‘s longer service life, better dimensional stability, and lower defect rate in precision applications, the total cost of ownership may favour POM despite the higher unit price.
Q4: Can POM and PA66 be used for food contact?
Only POM is FDA compliant for food contact (21 CFR 177.2470/2480 for natural grades). PA66 is not FDA approved for food contact due to potential amine migration. Always verify food contact compliance with the specific grade and manufacturer.
Choosing between POM and PA66? Contact NAGOMER for expert advice, or browse our POM sheets and PA66 products.
Week 1 complete — 14 articles published (Day 1–7)
NAGOMER — Engineering Plastic Solutions for Global Industries | www.nagomer.com
NAGOMER — Professional Engineering Plastics Solutions
www.nagomer.com | info@nagomer.com