News Centre

Send your inquiry

POM vs PA66: Mechanical Properties, Cost & Application Comparison

Side-by-Side Property Comparison

Property

POM (Polyacetal)

PA66 (Nylon 66)

Winner

Tensile strength (MPa)

70

80

PA66

Flexural modulus (GPa)

2.6

2.8

PA66 (dry)

Impact strength (kJ/m²)

8

12

PA66

Service temperature (°C)

100

120

PA66

Water absorption 24h (%)

0.22

1.5

POM

Water absorption (saturation %)

0.8

8.0

POM

Dimensional stability

Excellent

Poor (wet)

POM

Wear resistance

Excellent

Good

POM

Chemical resistance

Good

Fair

POM

Fatigue resistance

Excellent

Fair

POM

Cost (USD/kg)

4–8

3–6

PA66

Machinability

Excellent

Good

POM

Food contact (FDA)

✓ (natural)

POM 

pom (2)

Where POM Excels

Dimensional Stability in Humid Environments

POM‘s most significant advantage over PA66 is its dramatically lower moisture absorption. At saturation, PA66 absorbs up to 8% water by weight, causing:

· Dimensional swelling of 2–3%

· Reduction in tensile strength of 30–50%

· Decrease in flexural modulus of 50–70%

POM absorbs only 0.8% at saturation, maintaining dimensional tolerances and mechanical properties even in high-humidity or submerged applications.

Fatigue Resistance

POM‘s high crystallinity (75–85%) gives it outstanding fatigue resistance — the ability to withstand millions of loading cycles without failure. This makes POM the preferred material for:

· Gear wheels and racks

· Clip fasteners and snap-fit mechanisms

· Spring components and latches

· Conveyor belt links

Food Contact Compliance

Natural POM (both homopolymer and copolymer) is FDA compliant under 21 CFR §177.2470/2480. PA66 is not FDA approved for food contact due to amine migration concerns. This makes POM the automatic choice for food processing equipment.

Chemical Resistance

POM resists organic solvents, fuels, oils, and weak acids/bases better than PA66. PA66 is attacked by strong acids, bases, and some polar solvents that POM tolerates.

Where PA66 Excels

Higher Impact Strength

PA66‘s superior impact toughness (50% higher than POM) makes it the preferred choice for components subject to sudden impact loads — bumper brackets, tool housings, and protective covers.

Higher Temperature Resistance

PA66‘s continuous service temperature of 120°C (vs POM‘s 100°C) and higher HDT gives it an edge in under-hood automotive and industrial heating applications.

Cost Advantage

PA66 is typically 20–40% cheaper than POM, making it attractive for high-volume applications where POM‘s advantages (dimensional stability, wear resistance) are not critical.

Reinforcement Response

PA66 responds better to glass fibre reinforcement. PA66 GF30 achieves tensile strengths of 180 MPa, while POM GF30 reaches only 140 MPa. This makes glass-filled PA66 the preferred structural plastic for automotive and industrial components.

pa66 (14) photoroom

Application Selection Guide

Application

Recommended

Reason

Precision gears

POM

Dimensional stability, fatigue resistance

Food processing equipment

POM

FDA compliance, moisture resistance

Snap-fit clips/latches

POM

Fatigue resistance, spring-back

Chemical pump impellers

POM

Chemical resistance

Impact-resistant housings

PA66

Higher impact strength

High-volume automotive parts

PA66

Lower cost

Structural components (reinforced)

PA66 GF30

Better reinforcement response

High-temperature automotive

PA66

120°C service temp

For more material comparisons, see our PEEK vs PTFE guide and Engineering Plastics Overview.

FAQ

Q1: Is POM or PA66 better for gears?

POM is the preferred material for precision gears due to its superior fatigue resistance, dimensional stability (low moisture absorption), and excellent wear properties. PA66 gears may swell and change dimensions in humid environments, affecting mesh precision.

Q2: Which absorbs more moisture: POM or PA66?

PA66 absorbs significantly more moisture than POM. At saturation, PA66 absorbs up to 8% water by weight, while POM absorbs only 0.8%. This makes POM the clear choice for applications requiring dimensional stability in humid or wet environments.

Q3: Is POM or PA66 more cost-effective?

PA66 is typically 20–40% cheaper than POM. However, when factoring in POM‘s longer service life, better dimensional stability, and lower defect rate in precision applications, the total cost of ownership may favour POM despite the higher unit price.

Q4: Can POM and PA66 be used for food contact?

Only POM is FDA compliant for food contact (21 CFR 177.2470/2480 for natural grades). PA66 is not FDA approved for food contact due to potential amine migration. Always verify food contact compliance with the specific grade and manufacturer.

Choosing between POM and PA66? Contact NAGOMER for expert advice, or browse our POM sheets and PA66 products.

Week 1 complete — 14 articles published (Day 1–7)

NAGOMER — Engineering Plastic Solutions for Global Industries | www.nagomer.com

NAGOMER — Professional Engineering Plastics Solutions

www.nagomer.com  |  info@nagomer.com

滚动至顶部

Inquiry form