News Centre

Send your inquiry

PEEK Glass-Filled vs Unfilled: When to Use Each Grade

Unfilled PEEK (Natural / Virgin)

Properties

Property

Value

Tensile strength

98 MPa

Flexural modulus

3.6 GPa

Impact strength

7.5 kJ/m²

Elongation at break

30%

Density

1.32 g/cm³

Colour

Natural (cream/tan)

Surface resistance

10^16 Ω/sq (insulative)

Best Applications

Medical devices — FDA, USP Class VI, ISO 10993 compliant

Food contact — FDA 21 CFR 177.2415

Semiconductor — ultra-low metallic contamination

Electrical insulation — highest dielectric strength

Seals and gaskets — best elongation and flexibility

Any application requiring FDA or medical compliance — glass fillers may not be food-grade

Why Choose Unfilled

Regulatory compliance: Only unfilled PEEK meets FDA/USP Class VI

Highest elongation: 30% vs 3% for GF30 — better for sealing applications

Best impact toughness: Highest energy absorption

Electrical insulation: Glass reduces dielectric performance

Colour flexibility: Can be pigmented; filled grades are limited

ngm k12b (4)

PEEK GF30 (30% Glass-Filled)

Properties

Property

Value

vs Unfilled

Tensile strength

180 MPa

+84%

Flexural modulus

10 GPa

+178%

Impact strength

9 kJ/m²

+20%

Elongation at break

3%

-90%

Density

1.49 g/cm³

+13%

HDT (1.8 MPa)

315°C

+107%

Colour

Grey-green

Best Applications

· Structural brackets — 2× stiffer than unfilled

· High-temperature load-bearing — HDT 315°C

· Housings and enclosures — rigidity + temperature

· Automotive components — under-hood structural parts

· Industrial pump components — pressure + temperature

· Aerospace structural parts — weight-critical stiffness

Why Choose GF30

· Maximum stiffness: 10 GPa flexural modulus — 2.8× unfilled

· Higher HDT: 315°C vs 152°C — maintains stiffness at high temperatures

· Better creep resistance: Reduced deformation under sustained load

· Lower cost: Typically 20–25% cheaper than unfilled PEEK

· Higher strength: 180 MPa tensile — nearly double unfilled

Other PEEK Filled Grades

PEEK CF30 (30% Carbon Fibre-Filled)

· Tensile: 220 MPa (highest)

· Flexural modulus: 18 GPa (highest)

· Surface resistance: 10^3–10^5 Ω/sq (conductive — ESD applications)

· Best for: ESD components, maximum strength-to-weight, aerospace structural

PEEK Bearing Grade (PTFE + Graphite + Carbon)

· Lowest friction: 0.15 coefficient

· Best wear resistance: 100× lower wear rate than unfilled

· Best for: Bearing bushes, wear rings, dynamic seals, valve seats

Selection Decision Matrix

Requirement

Recommended Grade

FDA / medical compliance

Unfilled (natural)

Food contact

Unfilled (natural)

Maximum stiffness

PEEK GF30 or CF30

Maximum strength

PEEK CF30

Bearing / wear application

PEEK bearing grade

ESD protection

PEEK CF30

Electrical insulation

Unfilled

Sealing / flexibility

Unfilled

High-temperature structural

PEEK GF30

Cost optimization

PEEK GF30 (cheaper than unfilled)

For more on PEEK grades, see our PEEK Filled Grades Complete Guide. For PEEK properties, read our PEEK Plastic Sheet Guide.

k12n (28)

FAQ

Q1: Is glass-filled PEEK FDA compliant?

No, glass-filled PEEK is not FDA compliant for food or medical contact. The glass fibres are not approved food-contact additives. Only unfilled (natural/virgin) PEEK meets FDA 21 CFR 177.2415 and USP Class VI requirements.

Q2: Is PEEK GF30 stronger than unfilled PEEK?

Yes, PEEK GF30 is significantly stronger and stiffer than unfilled PEEK. Tensile strength increases by 84% (180 MPa vs 98 MPa) and flexural modulus increases by 178% (10 GPa vs 3.6 GPa). However, elongation at break decreases from 30% to 3%, making GF30 more brittle.

Q3: Which PEEK grade is best for bearings?

PEEK bearing grade (PTFE + graphite + carbon filled) is the best choice for bearing applications. It offers the lowest friction coefficient (0.15), highest wear resistance (100× lower wear than unfilled), and maintains PEEK‘s temperature and chemical resistance.

Q4: Is glass-filled PEEK cheaper than unfilled PEEK?

Yes, PEEK GF30 is typically 20–25% cheaper than unfilled PEEK. The glass fibre filler costs much less than PEEK resin, so replacing 30% of the material with glass fibres reduces the overall cost per kg.

Need help selecting the right PEEK grade? Contact NAGOMER for grade recommendations, or explore our PEEK products.

NAGOMER — Professional Engineering Plastics Solutions

www.nagomer.com  |  info@nagomer.com

滚动至顶部

Inquiry form